Skip to content

Matt Ridley: Hypocrisy is too feeble a word for the gulf between what world leaders preach at Cop28 and how much they still rely on fossil fuels

December 14, 2023

By Paul Homewood

 

As for predictable, do they take us for fools? After 27 previous Cop conferences we knew how this pantomime in Dubai would go.

Breakthrough! Deep into their umpteenth sleepless night of hard bargaining, the delegates at the Cop28 meeting in Dubai managed to upgrade a verb in their final deal.

Instead of saying nations ‘could’ take action, the agreement ‘calls on’ them to take action. Incredible! Cue rapturous applause and a standing ovation as representatives from 197 countries approved the historic ‘UAE Consensus’ on climate change.

‘There’s stronger verb forms but I think it does send a strong signal nonetheless,’ crowed a delegate from the World Resources Institute.

This verb miracle — alongside language about ‘transitioning away from fossil fuels in energy systems [electricity, heating, transport and industry] in a just, orderly and equitable manner’ — is as futile as it was predictable. It’s futile because it will lead to the cancellation of precisely zero coal-fired power stations or oil-exploration plans.

China and India, despite spouting the Cop catechism, are between them approving the equivalent of a new coal plant every two or three days.

In America, which led calls to transition away from fossil fuels, oil and gas production has never been higher: it now produces far more oil than Saudi Arabia. Brazil — while demanding the phasing out of fossil fuels — plans to become the world’s largest oil producer by 2030.

Hypocrisy is too feeble a word for this gap between preaching and practice.

As for predictable, do they take us for fools? After 27 previous Cop conferences we knew how this pantomime in Dubai would go.

As surely as night follows day, 98,000 gas-guzzling delegates, many of them arriving by private jet, would engage in a fortnight-long ordeal of hotel room service and then issue dire warnings of a breakdown. As expected, Saudi Arabia and other oil-producing nations would be reluctant to commit to the phase-out of fossil fuels. Yet, after a long night of haggling, a bleary-eyed announcement of a triumph would be greeted with hyperbole by an emotional BBC reporter. For the 28th time.

Remember that at Cop17 in Durban 12 years ago, world leaders agreed that by 2015 they would sign a legally binding treaty — not a voluntary one — to reduce emissions, which would apply to the whole world and come into force by 2020. Yet, at Cop21 in 2015 in Paris they decided instead to present as a great breakthrough a series of entirely voluntary and empty national promises, few of which have ever been implemented.

At the time I pointed this failure out in the House of Lords, saying that Paris therefore represented the end of a 20-year attempt to get agreement to legally binding emissions targets, leaving Britain as the only country with such a target.

For this sin of criticising the agreement, thereby raining on his parade, the minister — a colleague from my own party — chose to liken me to North Korea, the only state to stand apart from the Cop deal. Eight years on, the statistics on continually rising emissions show I was right and he was wrong.

So yesterday I celebrated the news of the breakthrough on verbs in Dubai by choosing a second-hand diesel car to replace my existing one. No, I am not being cynical: the data is clear that my emissions of carbon dioxide will be lower that way than if I had chosen a battery-electric vehicle.

According to Volkswagen’s calculations, in a typical European country such is the up-front carbon footprint of batteries and electricity that I would have to drive an electric car 80,000 miles before I would even start to save emissions, compared with an existing diesel — let alone one of the more efficient new ones. And I tend to trade in cars at 50,000 miles. So I am doing my bit by not buying electric.

In the year 2000, according to the Energy Institute Statistical Review of World Energy, 84 per cent of the world’s primary energy came from fossil fuels. Last year, after 23 years of transitioning away from fossil fuels — and 27 interminable Cop conferences since 1995 — that number was… 82 per cent. At this rate it will take us till the year 3909AD to give up fossil fuels. No wonder a large chunk of the population thinks these talks are futile nonsense.

Full post

26 Comments
  1. Harry Passfield permalink
    December 14, 2023 1:42 pm

    I begin to think that the endless COPS are just a charade – a means of hiding the real agenda…

    • December 14, 2023 2:35 pm

      Theatre my dear fellow!

      And look just how many faces are in the trough all paid for out of OUR pockets

      • gezza1298 permalink
        December 14, 2023 3:29 pm

        Not only at every COP have CO2 emissions from ALL sources increased but so have the number of troughers attending.

      • Harry Passfield permalink
        December 14, 2023 3:35 pm

        Hang on, Gezza! Have you just come up with a sign? The more attendees at COP the more MMCO2! Solution: Ban the Cops (or, as I keep hearing these days: Defund the Police!! 😉

    • December 14, 2023 4:19 pm

      They are simply marketing The Idea, an annual event keeps it in the news, thousands of attendees are allowed to encourage the army of foot soldiers. Environmentalism marches on in the decadent West, China and India not so much.

  2. December 14, 2023 1:46 pm

    Matt Ridley is always right and the BBC is always wrong. Every COP has been precictable to the independent observer. Thousands of gas-guzzlers in their private jets. Each COP over-running with a meaningless late final deal. What a waste of taxpayers’ money.

    • chriskshaw permalink
      December 14, 2023 2:22 pm

      Regrettably the money waste is not just limited to pointless meetings. The effortless way the government announces it has now “allocated GBP 2 bln to subsidize 11 green hydrogen projects in first national round” leaves me in awe. That’s our effin money they throwing away!

      • December 14, 2023 4:07 pm

        Money no longer available for genuine national needs.

    • John Bowman permalink
      December 15, 2023 3:26 pm

      Keystone Cops.

      Good for a laugh at the bungle brigade.

  3. GeoffB permalink
    December 14, 2023 2:01 pm

    It took 98,000 delegates to remove the word “could”, that is not really value for money. It has to stop, surely all that is needed is for meetings in each country to discuss the agenda of the COP and decide on the policy that they wish to adopt, and then send one or two individuals to represent their views.
    The IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission 170 countries 20,000 experts on everything electrical) has a system of working groups at National level, in the UK BSI is the authority, generally supported by trade associations. Leaders at National level then represent the UK policy at International Meetings. Agendas and Minutes are issued from all meetings for distribution back down the line, so all the experts get to see what has been decided. I was involved in this for 20 years eventually becoming Chairman of one group, it worked reasonably well.

    • Phoenix44 permalink
      December 14, 2023 3:05 pm

      Before getting in to all that, what exactly has changed since the last one? Despite the BBCs efforts, it’s clear the science and Green tech haven’t changed in 12 months, nor has the position of India, China and the rest. So why meet at all?

  4. edwardrodolph1891 permalink
    December 14, 2023 2:19 pm

    The whole global warmin’ nonsense is a sophisticated ‘scare’em creation, a HUGE money making SCAM.

  5. Ian M permalink
    December 14, 2023 2:20 pm

    The average ICE car is on the road for around 16 years. It looks like the average EV will be junk after around 8-9 years. If comparing carbon costs, Matt should be comparing 2 EVs to 1 ICE, which perhaps highlights the sheer stupidity of the ICE/Net Zero scam.

  6. Devoncamel permalink
    December 14, 2023 2:27 pm

    All the more reason to ditch the ruinous Climate Change Act, or preferably ignore it altogether and tell the inevitable legal challengers to get lost.
    We all know the real agenda here is to create world governance, all controlled by WEF toadies. Just when you thought feudalism had been consigned to history.

    • December 14, 2023 2:40 pm

      Well, here is a novel idea, we could do as St Greta keeps banging on about and “follow the science”. It has been abundantly clear till now the climatistas have been focussed only on political science, after all real scientists are few and far between batting for the dark side and rarely raise their heads above the parapet where it would be summarily removed should they be forced to explain the source of their income and the product produced to real scientists.

    • Phoenix44 permalink
      December 14, 2023 3:08 pm

      There can be no legal challenges if you simply repeal it. Parliament is sovereign, it makes and can unmake, the law. But after over a decade in power, the Tories have repealed or revused virtually nothing from the ruinous and disastrous Blair years. We have therefore to all intents and purposes, had a Labour government.

      • Mike Jackson permalink
        December 14, 2023 3:55 pm

        You’re right, but good luck with trying to repeal it. Only 5MPs voted against it in the first place.

  7. Gamecock permalink
    December 14, 2023 3:02 pm

    The Conference of the Parties is there to carve up the West. Tens of thousands there to try to get a piece.

    Again this year, the West has refused to be carved up. So they will try again next year.

    The finish line is the end of the West.

  8. Phoenix44 permalink
    December 14, 2023 3:02 pm

    And yet it appears our witless and lying government will ban gas boilers and force us all to buy things we don’t want whilst stopping us buying what we do want. I remain unclear how a supposed democracy could do this – isn’t choosing how we spend our money the fundamental democratic choice?we are sliding rapidly in to a long, cold, authoritarian winter of our own making.

  9. gezza1298 permalink
    December 14, 2023 3:35 pm

    We have the US to thank for Paris being an agreement as their constitution prevented Big Ears Obummer from signing any treaty without approval from congress.

    While we can celebrate the latest COP failure, the eco-fascist Financial Times suggested back in September that COP should switch to majority voting to allow them to approve much worse outcomes. Scary. It would mean we couldn’t repeal the Climate Change Act.

    • Phoenix44 permalink
      December 14, 2023 4:50 pm

      I’d like to see that majority go and stop China building a coal power station.

  10. gezza1298 permalink
    December 14, 2023 3:45 pm

    Chinese battery maker CATL is being hit by the cratering of battery car production at VW. Their factory in Erfurt, Thuringen is laying off staff and reducing production at battery cell demand drops.

    • Gamecock permalink
      December 14, 2023 10:22 pm

      Ford is reported to be backing off on making electric pickup trucks.

  11. Curious George permalink
    December 14, 2023 4:51 pm

    98,000 delegates! They should all stay in Dubai for the rest of their lives. Let’s repeat that approach at all future COPs.

  12. madmike33 permalink
    December 14, 2023 5:57 pm

    There’s always a silver lining they say and, in the case of COP28, it was the gathering of 98,000 useless people and keeping them away from areas where they might do harm. Their committees etc were mercifully beyond their influence for 2 weeks. I reckon thats good value especially as they produced nothing concrete that would affect our lives. I look upon these COP meetings as human fly paper.

  13. PostBREXIT permalink
    December 17, 2023 12:24 pm

    Net Zero isn’t about carbon or climate, it’s about global socialism and giving advantage to the third world who are exempt.

    Just as Ottmar Edenhoffer of the IPCC explained thirteen years ago. His statement about climate policy being international socialism in disguise was 100% correct.

    ”One must say clearly that we redistribute defacto the world’s wealth by climate policy. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy.”

    Furthermore……………

    “The climate system is a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible.”

    IPCC Third Assessment Report 2001

Comments are closed.